United States v. Darby (1941)

United States v. Darby (1941) was a highly influential case in the history of the relationship between federal and state law. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court set a groundbreaking precedent by allowing federal interference with local wage regulations in Georgia.
In many cases of the last half of the twentieth century—including the important Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964) and other decisions upholding modern antidiscrimination laws—the U.S. Supreme Court broadly construed federal authority to regulate local activities under the constitutional provision that gives the U.S. Congress the power to "regulate Commerce... among the several states." These decisions, in turn, built on key precedents handed down by the Court during the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s. During his first term of office, President Roosevelt sought to respond to the Great Depression by pushing through Congress a program of reform that deeply injected the federal government into the regulation of such matters as working conditions in local factories. Relying on constitutional arguments about state autonomy, the Supreme Court invalidated several of these laws in 1935 and 1936.
After President Roosevelt's landslide reelection in 1936, however, the Court dramatically shifted direction and began to reject states' rights challenges to federal initiatives founded on the commerce power. A critical juncture came in the Darby case, which involved the prosecution of a lumber manufacturer in Statesboro for violating the minimum-wage and maximum-hour protections put in place by the recently enacted federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Overruling earlier precedent, the Court in 1941 held that the law was a proper exercise of the congressional commerce power, including its application to local manufacturing concerns.
The Court also ruled in Darby that the Fair Labor Standards Act did not violate the Tenth Amendment's reservation to the states of powers not delegated to Congress. In rejecting this challenge, the Court described the Tenth Amendment as stating "but a truism," thus substantially limiting the usefulness of that provision as a means for raising constitutional arguments based on state autonomy from federal control. In the end, Roosevelt-era cases like Darby ushered in an era of such extreme judicial deference to assertions of congressional authority that no federal law was found to exceed the commerce power for the next fifty-four years.


Cite This Article
Coenen, Dan T. "United States v. Darby (1941)." New Georgia Encyclopedia. 20 August 2013. Web. 03 September 2015.
From Our Home Page
Howard Finster (ca. 1915-2001)

The Reverend Howard Finster emerged from the rural Appalachian culture of northeast Alabama and northwest Georgia to become one of America's most important creative personalities in the last quart

Southern Labor Archives

The Southern Labor Archives is committed to "collecting, preserving and making available the documentary heritage of Southern workers and their unions, as well as that of workers and unions having

Georgia Tech Football

With one of college football's dominant programs in the first half of the twentieth century, the Georgia Institute of Techno


The Georgia poultry industry is a highly mechanized production complex that markets chicken and egg products around the globe.

Courtesy of Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library, University of Georgia Libraries